Example report

What a recruiter actually sees.

This is a fictional example, not a real candidate — built to show the actual structure and tone of a Workplace Judgement report, not a mock-up. Every section below is real product copy.

Fictional example — Jordan Ellery is not a real candidate
Customer Service Team Leader · Team Responsibility

Jordan Ellery

Completed 14 March 2026 · 26 minutes · Assessment version 1

Integrity · Role-criticalJudgement & Decision Making · Role-criticalCustomer & Stakeholder FocusCollaboration

Overall score

78

out of 100

Solid evidence

Situational judgement

80

85% of overall weighting

Consistency

Consistent

How similarly they judged related situations

Assessment summary

78

Responses generally aligned with the judgement patterns associated with strong outcomes, with some areas worth exploring further at interview.

Strongest evidence

Integrity, Customer & Stakeholder Focus

Role-critical behaviour requiring exploration

Judgement & Decision Making

How the candidate approached different situations

Evidence grouped by the type of workplace situation, not by behaviour.

Customer situationsEffective responses
Conflict and disagreementMixed responses
Ethical judgementEffective responses
Workload and prioritisationLess effective responses

Judgement patterns worth exploring

Evidence-based patterns to probe at interview, not conclusions — each one is drawn directly from the candidate's own responses, never guessed.

Judgement & Decision Making

3 of 8 diverged

Across 2 scenarios tagged to this behaviour

  • —Escalates decisions that fall within their own authority more often than the role calls for
  • —Weighs evidence carefully but can be slow to commit under time pressure

Behaviour-by-behaviour analysis

Integrity

Role-criticalStrong evidence

88 / 100

Strong evidence — 12 scored decisions across 4 scenarios

Why this score

Responses most often aligned with the pattern our framework associates with strong outcomes here.

Customer & Stakeholder Focus

Strong evidence

81 / 100

Strong evidence — 9 scored decisions across 3 scenarios

Why this score

Consistently favoured actions that addressed the underlying need rather than the immediate ask.

Judgement & Decision Making

Role-criticalRole-critical — area to explore

66 / 100

Moderate evidence — 8 scored decisions across 2 scenarios

Why this score

Some responses showed more variation from that pattern, which is reflected below.

Collaboration

Solid evidence

74 / 100

Moderate evidence — 6 scored decisions across 2 scenarios

Why this score

Responses most often aligned with the pattern our framework associates with strong outcomes here.

Areas to explore at interview

Judgement & Decision Making · Interview question

“Tell us about a decision you made recently that you could have escalated but chose not to. What made you decide to handle it yourself?”

Integrity · Confirming strengths

“Tell us about a time you raised a concern about something that didn't feel right, even though it would have been easier to stay quiet. What made you decide to speak up?”

Tests whether strong assessment evidence is borne out by real experience.

A difference of a few points should not normally be treated as meaningful on its own — review the full behaviour profile, evidence strength and role relevance before drawing conclusions. Assessment results should be considered alongside interviews, experience and other relevant evidence, not as the sole basis for a hiring decision.

Fictional example — Jordan Ellery is not a real candidate